五、阅读理解。
You will be hungry tomorrow
One day Mother looks at Ron's shoes and says, "Look at your shoes. How dirty they are! You must clean them." "But I cleaned them only yesterday," says the boy. "They are dirty now. You must clean them again." "I don't want to clean them today. If I clean them today, they will be dirty again tomorrow." "All right. Don't do it then," Ron's mother says.
In the afternoon, Ron comes back from school. He is very hungry. He asks for something to eat. "You had breakfast in the morning and you had lunch at school, Ron," his mother says. "But I'm hungry again," says Ron. "Oh, hungry again? But if I give you something to eat today, you will be hungry again tomorrow."
根据短文内容，判断下列句子的正误，正确的画“√”，错误的画“×”。
(
√
) 1. Ron's shoes are very dirty.
(
×
) 2. Ron asks his mother to clean the shoes.
(
√
) 3. Ron is very hungry when he comes home.
(
√
) 4. Ron has lunch at school.
(
√
) 5. Ron is a lazy boy.
解析：
【分析】
要解决这类阅读理解判断正误题，首先需要通读短文，理解全文内容，然后逐个将题目句子与原文对应内容进行比对：
1. 先找第一题相关内容，原文开头妈妈明确指出Ron的鞋子很脏，可直接判断对错；
2. 第二题需注意动作的发出者，原文是妈妈让Ron擦鞋，并非Ron要求妈妈擦，据此判断；
3. 第三题看Ron放学回家后的状态，原文明确说他很饿，直接对应判断；
4. 第四题依据妈妈提到的Ron的用餐情况，找到对应语句判断；
5. 第五题需要结合Ron不想擦鞋的行为和妈妈的反驳，推理出Ron的性格特点，进而判断。
【解析】
1. 根据短文第一段第一句“Look at your shoes. How dirty they are!”可知，Ron的鞋子非常脏，该表述与原文一致，故画“√”。
2. 短文第一段是妈妈要求Ron清洁鞋子，Ron不想擦，并非Ron请求妈妈擦鞋，该表述与原文不符，故画“×”。
3. 根据短文第二段前两句“In the afternoon, Ron comes back from school. He is very hungry.”可知，Ron放学回家时非常饿，该表述与原文一致，故画“√”。
4. 根据短文第二段妈妈的话语“You had breakfast in the morning and you had lunch at school, Ron”可知，Ron在学校吃了午饭，该表述与原文一致，故画“√”。
5. Ron以“擦了明天还脏”为借口不想擦鞋，妈妈用同样逻辑反驳他“吃了明天还饿”，由此能看出Ron是个懒惰的男孩，该表述符合文意，故画“√”。
【答案】
1. √ 2. × 3. √ 4. √ 5. √
【知识点】
细节理解题；逻辑推理；阅读理解判断正误
【点评】
本文通过母子间有趣的对话设置题目，重点考查学生对文章细节的抓取能力和简单逻辑推理能力。做题时需仔细将题干内容与原文逐一比对，避免脱离原文主观判断。
【难度系数】
0.8
